The Delhi High Court has upheld an ex-parte GST demand order against Parshuram Yadav, noting the assessee’s failure to respond to a show cause notice and subsequent reminders. The court advised appeal as the appropriate remedy.
Appellant was notified by mail that the respondent had deposited Rs. 20 lakhs into the appellant’s account while the tribunal’s proceedings were still pending. Appellant argued that Rs. 20 lakh had been deposited without its consent and that it would be willing to reimburse the money.
ITAT Hyderabad remands Ujwal Foundation’s appeals for 80G approval and 12AB registration, citing Supreme Court precedent on considering proposed charitable activities.
CESTAT rules exporters are not liable for service tax on foreign bank charges deducted from export proceeds, citing previous judicial precedents.
The Madras High Court has remanded a GST case involving Tvl.Manikandan-SKR Agency, despite the appeal being time-barred, due to an ex-parte assessment order and the petitioner’s offer of a 25% pre-deposit.
CESTAT Chennai dismisses Customs’ appeal against Vasta Biotech, upholding prior ‘Martech DHA’ classification due to settled legal precedent and res judicata.
Delhi High Court sets aside tax order against Menka Chaturvedi, citing notice delivery issues and pending Supreme Court rulings on tax notification validity.
CESTAT Kolkata held that club not being an advertising agency, service tax cannot be levied for advertisement published in souvenir or any display carried out in club premises. Accordingly, service tax demand set aside.
The ITAT Delhi dismissed GE Steam Power Systems’ appeals for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17 after the company opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, allowing future revival if the settlement fails.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has remanded a case concerning Smasta Gurjar Kshatriya Kadiya Samaj Navsari, stating 80G exemption cannot be denied solely due to a religious object if religious expenditure is below 5% of total income.
