CESTAT Chandigarh held that steel balls are classifiable under the Chapter Heading 8482 9900 and not under Chapter Heading 8714 as contended by revenue. Accordingly, duty demand set aside.
Explore the tax liabilities, including GST, on Reliance Industries Ltd.’s acquisitions of foreign assets like Stoke Park, Hamley, and Mimosa Network. Get insights into RIL’s acquisitions in the last five years
Explore GST rates on stationery items used by students and online education services. Learn the reasons behind these rates and the government’s stance
Explore the case of Farooque Construction vs. Kerala GST – a partnership facing consequences for defaulting on settled tax dues under the Amnesty Scheme.
Kerala High Court orders a link provision for uploading appeals after technical glitches hindered submission. Judgment on failure to upload appeal in Ramakrishna Fuels vs CIT
CESTAT Mumbai held that forfeiture of security deposit justified as Customs Broker failed to act in a proactive manner in fulfilling their obligation as Customs Broker, particularly when the import documents were obtained from the importers through an intermediary.
CESTAT Mumbai held that revocation of Customs Broker license unjustified as punishment suffered by being out of Customs broker business for about two years is enough to mitigate case of violations or contraventions of CBLR, 2018.
Explore the recent Madras High Court ruling on GST Registration dispute involving Gopal Selvam. Details on the grounds, court’s view, and implications for businesses.
Neither the applicability of the legal provisions particularly with reference to the Arms Act and the Rules and various notifications had been considered nor any reasoning had been given with reference thereto, therefore, CESTAT quashed the Customs duty demand on the import of antique finished rifles with a direction to the appellate authority to consider the appeal and decide the same giving proper and substantive reasoning in support thereof.
Since assessee was not having any evidence even to prove the said fact that he had made the payment towards installment of loan for the muddamal vehicle, the Magistrate had to verify the aspect of ownership of the muddamal vehicle after conducting inquiry and should handover the custody of the muddamal vehicle at the end of the trial if assessee was able to prove his better title and possession over respondent without being influenced by any of the observations made by Revisional Court in Criminal Revision Application.
