In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court have given observations on the issue of unstamped arbitration agreement. It has been held that an arbitration agreement, which is unstamped, does not exist and an unstamped contract, containing an arbitration agreement, would not exist as it has no existence in law and it has been observed that such agreement would be impounded under Section 33 of the Stamp Act.
The Hon’ble High Court observed that for refusal of Registration under Section 11 of the Trademarks Act, it would have to be shown that the marks themselves are confusingly similar to each other, and that, owing to the similarity in the marks and the goods and services which they cover, there is a likelihood of confusion among the public, or a likelihood of the public believing the existence of an association between the marks.
Bombay Chartered Accountants Society requests a one-year deferment of Form 10B/10BB, citing challenges faced by charitable trusts in complying with the new audit requirements in India.
Learn about recent GST Authority decision to impose a 30-day time limit for reporting invoices on e-invoice portals, effective from November 1, 2023.
MCA imposed penalties for a 235-day delay in submitting Form MGT-14 for a Managing Director’s reappointment. Learn more about the case and penalties here.
Bombay High Court held that attachment of saving bank account and detention of goods in absence of duty demand without service of notice is also without jurisdiction and without any authority of law.
A detailed analysis of the Customs Authority of Advance Ruling (CAAR) Mumbai’s order on the classification of Linear Accelerators under heading 9022.
CESTAT Mumbai held that refund of unutilized Cenvat Credit of input services duly available even if there is export without payment of service tax.
CAAR held that Foil Balloons are made of Nylon/HDPE not of Latex/Rubber and imported for the purpose of party decoration or entertainment, merit classification under the heading 9505 and specifically under subheading 9505 9090 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Delve into the intricate details of the classification of Lenovo’s Interactive Large Format Displays under Indian Customs Law. Find out why these products merit a particular sub-heading.
