CESTAT Delhi held that when the demand of duty has been settled under SVLDR Scheme, the imposition of penalty would fail on simple ground that if the appellants had applied under the said scheme, they would have paid ‘nil’ duty.
DGFT delists 29 agencies from FTP 2023 Appendix 2E for failing to adopt e-CoO platform. Details and impact in this update
Learn about SEBI’s latest circular on enhancing its SCORES platform for investor grievance redressal. Discover how this update impacts listed companies, intermediaries, and designated bodies, and the timelines for compliance.
Read about invitation extended by the U.S. Department of Justice for CBIC’s participation in IPCEN meeting in Bangkok, Thailand, and its significance in combating intellectual property crimes.
Learn about extension of timelines for obtaining the MahaRERA Real Estate Agent Certificate of Competency. Stay compliant with MahaRERA regulations.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that as appellant has not exited from Special Economic Zone (SEZ), they are not eligible for clearing capital goods under the prevalent Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG Scheme).
Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is liable to pay excise duty on leftover stock of liquor transferred by two erstwhile licensees, both the erstwhile licensees and the Petitioner are one and the same. The manufacturer and seller of the liquor was only one i.e. the Petitioner and hence excise duty payable.
CESTAT Delhi held that revocation of customs broker licence and penalty action thereof on customs broker justified as he duly facilitated export of Prohibited items i.e. Gutkha pouches.
Discover how CA-TDSMAN revolutionizes tax compliance for Chartered Accountants and Tax Professionals, fostering seamless collaboration and strengthening client relationships.
Read about Madras High Court’s ruling in Devendran Coal International Private Limited Vs ITO. Learn why a fresh assessment order is ordered under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961.
