Join our free webinar on July 4th at 4:00 PM to gain insights into the dematerialization of securities and recent amendments. Register now for key updates.
Join our free webinar on July 7 at 5 PM for insights into 10 recent High Court income tax judgments favoring assessees. Expert analysis by CA Dipak Dama.
It is directed to invite your attention to Board’s Circular No. 76/99-Customs, dated 17.11.99, on the above subject and to say that a doubt has beenraised with regard to debiting of bond in case of fresh import or local procurement of raw materials/capital goods. The doubt is in the context of sub-clause (v) of paragraph 6 of the above said Circular wherein it has been mentioned that the duty for
Circular No. 533/29/2000-CX Kindly find enclosed a copy of CEGAT final order No. 1222/99A dated 24.8.99 in case of M/s Escorts (JCB) Ltd. which has given a new dimension to the term “place of removal” used in Sec. 4 of Central Excise Act and point of time when the goods can be said to have been sold, which is in favour of revenue.
Circular No. 532/28/2000-CX Instances have come to the notice of the Board where it has been noticed that cases are not being investigated carefully and all relevant facts relating to the case are not being incorporated in SCNs and the adjudication orders. As a result when the issue is agitated before the CEGAT either by the party or the Department, CEGAT gives benefit of doubt to the party since DR is not in a position to explain finer issues/facts of the case.
Circular No. 531/27/2000-CX It is directed to refer to the Board’s Circular No. 459/25/99-CX dated 8.6.99 whereby the “Proforma of Declaration” under rule 173C relating to commodities notified under section 4A has been specified. Your attention is drawn to Note (2) in the Said Proforma (which was based on erstwhile Explanation 2 to section 4A) wherein it is mentioned that in case of different retail sale price for different regions/States,
It has been observed in Chennai Customs House that certain parties had faraudulently obtained payment of drawback by fabrication of export documents, wherein in the exporters were effected by certain exporters and the documents were fabricated in the name of a third party, who ultimately obtained payment of drawback. Some of the relevant drawback claims had been returned to the exporters
