Karnataka High Court rules Section 263 cannot be invoked solely due to the absence of a DVO report, if best judgment assessment was an option.
The plaintiff entity is a company engaged in the business of constructing and redeveloping immovable properties, either on a contractual or collaborative basis, and subsequently selling such properties.
Madras High Court sets aside IT assessment orders for Vetrivel Minerals citing lack of incriminating evidence and breach of natural justice principles.
Gujarat High Court examines the procedure for faceless income tax assessment and the assessee’s right to a personal hearing via video conference under Section 144B.
ITAT Mumbai deleted a penalty, citing a defective notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c), following the Bombay High Court’s ruling in Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh.
Gujarat HC rules in CIT vs Mitesh Impex that new tax deduction claims (80IB/80HHC) can be made at appeal stage without a revised return, distinguishing Goetze.
ITAT Kolkata quashes assessments in absence of incriminating material; DVO’s cost estimate alone held insufficient under Abhisar Buildwell precedent.
ITAT Nagpur sets aside CIT(E)’s rejection of 12A registration, holding assessee not liable for file access issues on ITBA portal.
Delhi High Court held that section 153C of the Income Tax Act doesn’t required AO to find or uncover a relationship or an association between the searched and the non-searched person.
ITAT Mumbai held that the very basis of which the Assessing Officer formed the belief that the income liable to tax is escaped assessment was based upon incorrect understanding of the facts and is, therefore, not sustainable in the eyes of law.
