Charge: Not complying with directions issued by Insurance Regulatory And Development Authority of India. Decision: The Insurer Max Life Insurance Co. Ltd has not complied with the directions issued by the Authority vide letters dated 28th January, 2021, and dated 5th February, 2016. Therefore, a penalty of Rs 1 crore (Rupees One Crore only) is […]
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Order No: IRDAI/LIFE/ORD/MISC/209 /10/2022 Date: 12-10-2022 Background 1. A focused onsite inspection of M/s. Pramerica Life Insurance Co. Ltd., (the Insurer) was conducted from 14th October 2019 to 18th October 2019 and inspection report was shared with the insurer for their comments vide letter dated 30th December 2019. Response of the […]
Considering the submissions of the insurer as above, the charge is not being pressed. The insurer is however, advised to strengthen the internal checks and balances to avoid re-occurrence of clerical errors going forward.
DC observes that the CIRP Regulations covers the complete expenses and fees of the IRP/ RP, and this fee is payable after ratification by the CoC. The approval by the CoC of the expenses incurred in the CIRP is a mechanism for keeping a check on the expenditures made by the IRP/ RP. In the […]
With introduction of the facility, Post Office Small Savings customers will be able to access the account details anytime, anywhere and without the need of having Net Banking or the Mobile Banking access e-Passbook facility can be accessed by an account holder through the registered mobile number.
Discover how Zyden Gentec Limited faced an ₹8 Lakh penalty from MCA for not attaching Secretarial audit report (in form MR-3) for financial years 2015-16 and 2016-17, as required by Section 204 of Companies Act, 2013. Details of violation and penalties explained.
In a recent development, the Registrar of Companies, Rajasthan, Jaipur, has taken strict action against M/s INTERLINK EXPORTS LIMITED and its key personnel, Shri NARAYAN TUKARAM BADDI (CFO) and Shri ALOK NARAYAN BADDI (CEO), for their failure to comply with the provisions of Section 204(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. This non-compliance pertains to the […]
it is found that Mr. Prakash had neither disclosed the appointment of his brother through M/s Ibay Capital before the CoC nor made relationship disclosure of engagement of M/s Ibay Capital on the website of the IPA. Further, the valuation report was submitted by M/s iVas Partners whose appointment or fee was not approved/ratified by […]
Order for Penalty of Rs. 4.50 lakh under Section 454 for violation of Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014
Sub-section (8) provides that if a company is in default in complying with the provisions of this section, the company shall be liable to a penalty of three lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees.
