ITAT Mumbai set aside a cryptic CIT(A) order and remanded the entire case to the AO, directing a de novo inquiry into unexplained fixed deposits, cash, and flat investment after admitting new bank certificates and considering natural justice principles.
The ITAT Mumbai deleted an addition of ₹46 lakh in the Rekha Rajesh Jogani case, ruling that the Income Tax Department cannot rely solely on general ‘penny stock’ investigation reports to deny Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG).
Supreme Court held that only up to three adjournments may be granted under GST law and denial beyond this does not violate natural justice principles.
Issuance of a valid notice under section 143(2) was mandatory and non-issuance or belated issuance vitiated the assessment. Accordingly, Tribunal quashed the reassessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144B as being void ab initio.
Reassessment order passed under Section 147/143(3) was quashed on the ground that no notice under Section 143(2) was issued after the assessee filed the return in response to notice under Section 148, rendering the assessment void ab initio.
CAAR Mumbai ruled that oven-roasted areca nuts with 10–15% moisture content are to be classified as raw under Chapter 8, while roasted cashew, walnut, and pista nuts fall under Chapter 20 as roasted nuts per specific tariff entries.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has allowed Shree Sai Constructions’ appeal, setting aside a Rs.6.04 Cr capital gains addition.
The ITAT Mumbai, in Mohan Thakurdas Gurnani Vs ITO, deleted penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for notional income from house property, holding that penalty requires actual concealment, not notional additions.
The Karnataka High Court is hearing a petition from Amazon Development Centre India Private Limited challenging an order rejecting its GST refund claim.
Dismissing the plea of unawareness of portal notices, the Delhi High Court upheld that assessees must regularly check the GST portal. Yet, to uphold natural justice, it remanded the matter for reconsideration since no reply or personal hearing was granted.
