DCIT Vs M/s Dynamic Transmission Limited (ITAT Delhi) With regard to addition of Rs. 63,66,574/- on account of job work charges u/s. 80IC of the I.T. Act, 1961 is concerned, we note that the AO has observed that deduction u/s. 80IC is available only in respect of articles or things manufactured by itself in its […]
Question of disallowance under section 40A(3) would not arise, where assessee had not claimed the payments as expenditure, while computing its business income.
Visvesvaraya Technological University Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee has moved an application for registration under section 12A on 25.05.1999, but this application was not disposed of by the CIT and it was kept pending and assessee was persuaded by the Revenue to file another application for registration. Vide letter dated 2 1.01.2002, the assessee has also […]
Shri Ashok Kumar Aggarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) AO repudiates the return filed u/s 1 58BC (a) of the Act and proceeds to make an enquiry, he has to necessarily follow the provisions of section 142, 143(2) and 143(3) of the Act. In the case before us, the Department has not been able to negate […]
ITA Nos.405/2005 and 406/2005 have been filed by an individual, Arjun Malhotra impugning common order dated 29th January, 2004 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal) deciding ITA Nos.1433/Del/2002 and 1434/Del/2002 relating to Assessment Years (AY, for short) 1998-99 and 1999-2000
Gouranga Cement Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. In the instant case the assessee has shown business income of ₹13,36,761/- and LTCG income of ₹86,30,498/- only. Besides the above assessee has shown unabsorbed brought forward business loss of ₹16,64,542/- which was set […]
Whether transportation charges received by the applicant are liable to GST, especially when the applicant is not a goods transport agency (GTA)
Simply because the assessee could not produce the dealers, the entire purchases could not be treated as bogus purchases as AO could have made further investigations to ascertain the genuineness of the transactions.
When income of assessee was determined on estimation basis of net profit, then no penalty under section 271(1)(c) could be imposed for concealment and furnishing inaccurate particulars.
L&T Finance Ltd. Vs DCIT ( ITAT Mumbai) We have given a thoughtful consideration to the facts of the case and are of the considered view that ‘Slump sale’ as defined in section 2(42C) means the transfer of one or more undertakings as a result of the sale for a lump sum consideration, without values […]
