In re Susheela Agrovet (GST AAR Telangana) chicken intestine waste is classifiable under heading 0505 of the Customs Tariff heading as the said heading covers “Skins and other parts of birds, with their feathers or down, feathers and parts of feathers (whether or not with trimmed edges) and down, not further worked than cleaned, disinfected […]
Applicant is dealing with products made of coir fibre. In the submissions made by the applicant they have stated that the end use of their products that are being manufactured are in Carpet underlaying, packaging, mattress layers etc.
The concessional rate of tax @ 5% as given under Notification No. 47/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 is applicable only for Interstate sales i.e., on IGST and concessional rate of tax @ 2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST is applicable for Intrastate supplies as per Notification No. 45/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017.
In re Ginni Filament Limited (GST AAR Uttarakhand) In this case applicant sought Classification of goods namely Wet Baby Wipes, Wet Face Wipes, Bed and Bath towels, Shampoo Towels and AAR held that Wet Baby Wipes, Wet Face Wipes,Bed and Bath Towels and Shampoo Towels are taxable at rate of 18% GST under HSN 3307. […]
Kaniayamparambil Steels Vs Asstt. Sales Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) The petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the 1st respondent, under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. 2. Earlier, a Division Bench of this Court, under similar circumstances, disposed of W.A. No.1802 […]
Pr. CIT Vs Britannia Industries Ltd (Calcutta High Court) If an assessing officer doubts the quantum of expenditure incurred towards exempted income, is it mandatory for the assessing officer to apply the formula prescribed in rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 or can he take a view otherwise? This is the question which is […]
Addition under section 68 on account of share application money received from non-resident was not justified as money brought into India by non-residents for investment or other purposes was not liable to Indian Income Tax.
M/s. Spentex Industries Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), having its registered office at 51-A, B & C, Sector-Ill, Industrial Area, Pithampur Distt. Dhar (M.P.), are engaged in the manufacture of Textile Yarn. The Applicant are registered with the GSTN holding GSTIN 23AADCK3039P2ZC.
Recently, in Union of India v. Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd., Hon’ble SC had resolved the existing controversy regarding whether reimbursement expenses provided by service receiver are to be included in value of taxable service for charging to service tax.
K. Vinod Chandran Vs Ashok Menon (Kerala High Court) The impugned judgments in the above appeals disposed of a batch of writ petitions as also writ petitions, individually, filed by the assessee-petitioners against notices issued for assessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for brevity “KVAT Act”). The issues raised being identical, reference […]
