DPJ Viniyog Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Assessing Officer treated the income on account of purchase and of shares under the head ‘business income’ instead of under the head ‘capital gain’ as claimed by the assessee. On Appeal CIT(A) held that assessee is making purchase and sale on a continuous basis and besides being […]
Sh. Shridhar Bedi through Legal Heir Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) Proper notice u/s 148 of the Act for initiating reassessment proceeding is not a mere procedural requirement but the service of the prescribed notice on the assessee is a condition precedent to the validity of any of the reassessment made u/s 147. It is settled […]
M/s. Nidhi Packers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Learned counsel for the assessee has contended that the due date of filing of return of income for the year under consideration was extended by the CBDT by a period of 15 days and since the return originally filed by the assessee was within such extended […]
Payment towards outright purchase of copyright and technical know-how over the software could not be treated as royalty paid for acquisition of right to use copyrights and technical know-how, therefore, said payment could not be subjected to TDS under section 194J.
The appeals are directed against the Order in Original No. 20/2013 dated 11.03.2013 as well as Order-in-Original No.66/2013 dated 07.11.2013. The appellant is a dealer of M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd. (in short hereinafter called as “MUL”) in respect of the cars manufactured by MUL
Security deposit for taking office space on lease and subsequently terminating the agreement due to business consideration was a business decision and loss on account of forfeiture of security deposit had occurred in the course of business and was, therefore, allowable.
Respondent assessee is a private limited company. The business premises of the company was subjected to survey operation under section 133 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act for short). During the survey operation, the Revenue claimed to have seized and impounded a diary which allegedly reveal certain cash transactions with respect to sell of Vatva land. Statement of the directors of the company were also recorded.
Applicant has sought for Advance Ruling on the question that Whether the amount paid to dealer towards ‘rate difference’ post supply can be considered for the purpose of arriving at the ‘transaction value’ in terms of Section 15 of the Central Goods and Service Act’2017 ?. But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their letter dated 29.05.2018, even prior to personal hearing.
Applicant has sought for Advance Ruling on the applicability of GST for slump sale and also GST applicability on the stock which is part of slump sale. But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their letter dated 17.04.2018, even prior to personal hearing.
In Re M/s H&M Hennes & Mauritz India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the auxiliary services provided by H&M Hennes & Mauritz India Private Limited to Plus Trading Far East Limited, Hong Kong in terms of Auxiliary Services Agreement dated 19th January 2015 (effective from 01 February 2015) qualify as Export of Services under […]
