All interim orders passed by the High Court at Madras – Principal Bench that were subsisting as on 20th March, 2020 may stand extended till 30th April, 2020 unless vacated or modified earlier or until further orders of the Court unless specifically dealt with by any judicial order to the contrary.
We find it appropriate to continue all interim orders which are operating till today and are not already continued by some other courts / authority including this court and the same shall remain in force till 30.04.2020, subject to liberty to parties to move for vacation of interim orders only in extreme urgent cases.
Asman investments Ltd. Vs DCIT (Gujarat High Court) Interest as per Interest Act will be charged on company irrespective of its main object whether it is Finance or not In the given case the appellant assessee filed return of chargeable interest on 29.1.2002 declaring chargeable interest at ‘Nil’. In the statement attached to the return […]
In the absence of failure on the part of assesse to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment, the reopening of assessment beyond a period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year was without authority of law.
Re. Tiger Global International II Holdings, Mauritius & Ors (Authority for Advance Rulings New Delhi) Facts: ♠ Tiger Global International (II, III, IV) were the applicants, the Mauritius based companies which holds several shares in the Flipkart Private Limited, the Singapore based Company, the company which derive its substantial value from the assets located in […]
In view of the outbreak of COVID-19, the functioning of this Court is restricted only to urgent matters vide Notification No.51/RG/DHC/dated 13.03.2020.
Having regard to the public announcement of imposing a total lock down in the wake of outbreak of pandemic Corona Virus, resulting in immobilization of public at large, and total stoppage of public transport, litigants would find it difficult to approach the Courts to vindicate their grievances. Therefore, we deem it proper to issue directions in the instant suo motu writ petition.
Volkswagen Finance Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In this case ITAT held that we are of the considered view that the income embedded in payment to the international celebrity (Nicholas Cage), for participation in Dubai A8L launch event for promoting the business of the assessee in India, is taxable as arising from a ‘business […]
Mrinal Roy Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Once it is established that the tax has been deducted at source, the bar under Section 205 of the Act comes into operation and the revenue is barred from recovering the TDS amount once again from the employee from whose income, TDS amount has been It is pertinent to […]
The Assessing Officer disallowed expense of Rs. 1,27,500 u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act on finding that the said expenditure relates to some advertisements connected to demise / birthday greetings / congratulating some politicians, etc.
