Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Re Tiger Global International II Holdings, Mauritius & Ors (Authority for Advance Rulings New Delhi)
Appeal Number : AAR/04/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/03/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : AAR Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Re. Tiger Global International II Holdings, Mauritius & Ors (Authority for Advance Rulings New Delhi)

Facts:

♠ Tiger Global International (II, III, IV) were the applicants, the Mauritius based companies which holds several shares in the Flipkart Private Limited, the Singapore based Company, the company which derive its substantial value from the assets located in the India.

♠ The Mauritius based companies had made investments in the Flipkart (Singapore) in various tranches during the period from Oct-2011 to Apr-2015, therefore, these companies were eligible to get benefit of grandfathering clause as per amended DTAA between India & Mauritius.

♠ On 18.08.2018 all the three applicants transferred certain shares of Singapore Co. to Fit Holdings S.A.R.L. (Buyer), a company incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg. These transfers were undertaken as part of a broader transaction involving the majority acquisition of Singapore Co. by Walmart Inc., a company incorporated in the United States of America, from several shareholders, including the applicants.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Author Bio

Manish Harchandani (founder of Harchandani & Associates) is practicing Chartered Accountant and mainly practice in Direct Tax, International Taxation, Transfer Pricing & FEMA related advisory, litigation & compliance matters. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Registration of Trust under Income Tax – Analysis of New Provisions IT refund not received? Know provision of Withholding of IT Refund Determination of Period of Holding of Capital Asset – Short Term or Long Term No incriminating material, no addition – Kolkata ITAT Revisionary proceedings u/s 263 against reassessment proceedings are confined to reasons recorded u/s 148 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031