Held that any step of reduction in the pay scale and recovery from a Government employee would tantamount to a punitive action because the same has drastic civil as well as evil consequences.
In lieu of the appellant discontinuing the commodity brokerage business, BNP Paribas offered compensation of Rs.40 crores. Pursuant thereto, in a meeting held on 23.05.2008, resolution was passed by the Board of Directors of the appellant accepting the said offer.
Madras High Court held that the imposition of penalty for the minor discrepancy in the variance in the address in the Tax Invoices and the E-Way Bill would not justify the penalty under Section 129(5) of CGST Act.
Delhi High Court held that addition of value of shares granted under the Employees Stock Purchase Scheme as perquisite in terms of section 17(2)(iiia) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable in law.
ITAT Jaipur rules in favor of Hitkari Vidyalaya Sahkari Shiksha Samiti Ltd, allowing 80P deduction on interest income from cooperative banks for AY 2017-18 & 2020-21.
Delhi High Court held that that no notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act shall be issued if four years “but not more than six years” have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year.
The Madras High Court ruled that the 2016 amendment to Section 50C of the Income Tax Act applies retrospectively, impacting capital gains assessment for earlier years.
Allahabad HC dismisses Shiv Trading’s petition challenging GST penalty due to failure to prove genuine transactions and actual physical movement of goods.
CESTAT Kolkata held that activity of laying down the pipelines for Government/ Government Undertaking for supply of water from Kerala Water Authority (KWA) in Thiruvananthapuram city doesn’t attract service tax. Accordingly, refund claim allowed.
NCLAT clarifies that non-declaration of dividend and director changes cannot be considered acts of oppression and mismanagement in family-run companies.
