This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty for minor discrepancy in address between Tax invoice and e-way bill not justifiable: Madras HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jindal Pipes Limited Vs Deputy State Tax Officer (Int) (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Jindal Pipes Limited Vs Deputy State Tax Officer (Int) (Madras High Court)
Madras High Court held that the imposition of penalty for the minor discrepancy in the variance in the address in the Tax Invoices and the E-Way Bill would not justify the penalty under Section 129(5) of CGST Act.
Facts- The petitioner is before this Court challenging the impugned order dated 05.09.2023, whereby, the penalty of Rs.8,74,036/- was imposed on the consignment carried in conveyance bearing No.KA01AM5532. The supplier from Bellari District has supplied the consignment of steel pipes to Tutico...





