ITAT Bangalore rules CIT(A) cannot dismiss an income tax appeal on limitation grounds after con-doning the delay. Case remitted for fresh consideration.
ITAT directs fresh adjudication in Prakruthi Mahila Credit Society vs ITO case after 5 rapid notices were issued by CIT(A) within 40 days, disregarding Form 35 facts.
ITAT condones 19-day delay in Geetha Gopalan vs DCIT due to outdated email address and remits case to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Madras High Court held that two equal time additions towards purchase suppression is unwarranted. Thus, two equal time additions deleted, however, addition towards purchase suppression and penalty u/s. 16(2)(d) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 sustained.
ITAT remits Syed Ariff’s case to CIT(A) after hearing notices were sent via email despite his request in Form 35 to avoid email communication. Fresh adjudication ordered.
Guwahati High Court held that tender process for construction of Assam Type Sub-Centre Building under Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Department work is not allocated in accordance with law and accordingly, directed to allocate balance of works to eligible bidders.
Signing of the assessment order was an integral part of order generation in e-assessment and the assessment proceedings conclude only after the order was digitally signed, therefore, signing of the assessment order should not be brushed aside lightly.
ITAT Raipur held that belated return of income filed by payee u/s. 139(4) satisfies the 1st proviso to section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act hence assessee cannot be treated as ‘assessee in default’.
ITAT Cuttack held that difference between the sales declared in the profit and loss account and as per the cash book entire added by PCIT without providing sufficient opportunity to reconcile the same. Thus, AO directed to examine the issue.
ITAT Delhi held that even though assessee is not the owner of the Airport Metro Express Line Project it has right to collect fare from commercial operations. Thus, depreciation is eligible on such intangible assets as per provisions of section 32(1)(ii).
