ITAT Orders Fresh Adjudication After CIT(A) Issues 5 Notices in 40 Days Without Considering Form 35 Facts

Prakruthi Mahila Credit Society Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

In the case of Prakruthi Mahila Credit Society Vs. ITO, the assessee appealed against the order issued by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) for the assessment year 2017-18. The dispute arose after the CIT(A) issued five notices for hearing over a span of 40 days without sufficient time for the assessee to respond. Despite the CIT(A)’s reliance on a previous ruling in PCIT Vs. Ashokji Chanduji Takor, where sufficient opportunities were given, the assessee argued that the time gaps between notice

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.