The Karnataka High Court, upholding the ITAT’s order, reiterated that discounts on the issuance of ESOPs are allowable deductions under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, in line with the decision in Biocon Ltd.
CESTAT Kolkata held that the payment of Management Fee and the License Fee not being relatable to the imported goods and condition precedent to the sale of imported goods are therefore not includible in the transaction value.
Delhi High Court held that cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect without affording sufficient opportunity of being heard is unjustified. Accordingly, order cancelling GST registration set aside.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the severance compensation received by the employee is a capital receipt and the same is not chargeable to tax under Section 17(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
CIT(A) held that as per Section 5 of the Act , if an individual is residing for more than 183 days in India he would be considered as Resident in India and his entire global income would be taxable in India. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the applicability of Section 13 of the Income Tax Act should only be examined during assessment and not at the registration stage under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, CIT(E) directed to evaluate the application afresh.
Bombay HC rejects faulty Customs affidavit; new filing required by September 20. Court gives Surgive Meena another chance to comply.
Karnataka High Court directs the restoration of GST registration wrongly canceled due to administrative error within 4 weeks, subject to tax filing and payment.
ITAT Bangalore directs fresh adjudication after non-appearance due to hearing notices sent to a non-communication email. Assessee’s appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Madras HC condones delay in filing GSTR 3B beyond 30 days under GST Act, provided the taxpayer pays late fees. Tax assessment may follow for any shortfall.
