In the impugned order it has been held that supply of free power is nothing but “consideration” towards licensing services rendered by the State Governments. The correctness of this view is assailed in the Writ Petition.
AO proceeded to finalize the assessment based on available records, as the assessee had still not responded or provided any explanations regarding the unexplained cash deposits. AO added the unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 3,13,34,845/- to the total income.
The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 13.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the financial year 2018-19.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that continuation of order of attachment and Garnishee impermissible since petitioner has preferred an appeal against the assessment order and has paid 10% of the disputed tax as required under section 107 of the CGST Act.
The petitioners prays that directions be issued to the respondents to refund an amount of ₹22,00,000/-, which the petitioners claim that they were coerced to deposit during the course of search conducted by the respondents.
Madras High Court held that matter regarding denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) u/s. 16(4) of the CGST Act is remanded back in terms of Clauses 114 and 146 of the Finance (No.2) Bill, 2024 and enacted in the Finance Act, 2024.
Madras High Court held that imposition of interest for belated filing of GSTR-3B return without affording sufficient opportunity is unjustifiable and hence the order set aside and matter is remanded back for fresh consideration.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that co-operative society is entitled for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act for funds deposited in co-operative banks. Accordingly, action of AO set aside.
Competition Commission of India has dropped anti-profiteering proceedings against Ireo Waterfront Pvt. Ltd, confirming no additional ITC benefits post-GST.
Analysis of the Principal Commissioner vs Ranga 70 MM case, involving anti-profiteering issues in GST reduction for cinema ticket prices under Section 171 of the CGST Act.