Assessee received a notice under Section 148A(a) in name of M/s.Patel Govindbhai Somabhai and Company-a partnership firm having PAN No.AAFFP3449M for Assessment Year 2019-20.
The appeal by the Commissioner, CGST, Rohtak was dismissed as infructuous due to delay in filing against the AAR ruling on composite supply classification.
Imaging Solutions Pvt Ltd’s GST appeal was rejected by AAAR Haryana due to incomplete payment of the mandated appeal fee, rendering it non-maintainable under GST law.
Rajasthan GST AAAR clarifies that scrap materials are excluded from Margin Scheme and do not qualify as second-hand goods under GST, impacting tax applicability for scrap dealers and recyclers.
GST AAAR Rajasthan clarifies the inclusion of free diesel in GTA services and rules on time limit objections for appeals under the CGST Act.
Kerala HC rules ITC is a conditional right under CGST, dismissing Tirupati Balaji Traders’ plea for input tax credit without supplier tax payment compliance.
Assessee filed an appeal concerning the penalty of ₹20,29,394 levied under Section 271AAA for AY 2008-09. It had initially declared a total income of ₹23,62,74,550 in its Return of Income (ROI).
Penalty imposed under Section 114AA of the Customs Act was quashed as declared value in bills of entry could not be rejected relying on proforma invoice and demands could not be raised without challenging the assessment orders.
ITAT Kolkata held that when date of agreement and date of registration are not same, then, stamp duty value on the date of agreement should be considered. Accordingly, since difference is less than 10%, hence addition u/s. 56(2)(vii) unjustified.
Bombay High Court held that bonafide delay on the part of the Chartered Accountant in filing Return could not be a ground to reject the application for condonation of delay. Accordingly, two days delay condoned as delay appears to be wholly bonafide.
