Allahabad HC quashes GST demand against Solvi Enterprises, ruling that the selling dealer was registered at the time of transaction. Case remanded for fresh review.
PCIT Vs Greenply Industries Ltd (Gauhati High Court) The Gauhati High Court’s recent judgment in “The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s GreenPly Industries Ltd.” provides valuable clarification on the characterization and resultant tax treatment of excise duty exemptions. The court’s decision, delivered on March 4, 2025, addresses two crucial questions: whether excise duty […]
Kerala High Court held that when contract rates fixed are inclusive of GST and other taxes, contractor is not permitted to claim GST over and above the fixed rates. Accordingly, writ dismissed.
ITAT Mumbai held that Sai Baba Sansthan Trust being both charitable and religious trust falls within exceptions provided under section 115BBC(2) and hence anonymous donations received is not liable to be taxed under section 115BBC of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that developer is entitled for deduction under section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act for carrying out development work by entering into a contract with the Government. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Raipur held that assessment framed by AO u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act without issuance of notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act is invalid and cannot be sustained in the eyes of law.
ITAT Raipur held that entire addition of transaction in the hands of assessee under section 69 of the Income Tax Act as unexplained investment not tenable since the same needs to be allocated between joint beneficial owners. Thus, matter restore back to file of AO.
ITAT Delhi held that re-assessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act initiated due to change of opinion without having any fresh material on record is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Delhi High Court held that imposition of penalty under section 271DA of the Income Tax Act is justifiable since there is no inordinately and inexplicably delay in initiation of penalty proceedings. Accordingly, writ dismissed.
Delhi High Court held that reassessment order is liable to be set aside as it was based on information that was fully examined in the earlier round of reassessment u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, appeal allowed and order set aside.
