Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Melekandy Puthalath Farook Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Melekandy Puthalath Farook Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)

ITAT Chennai held that notice u/s 274 r.w.s.270A of the Act was not a valid notice for the reason that the AO did not specify the satisfaction as to whether assessee had either ‘under reported the income or ‘misreported the income’. Thus, imposition of penalty not justified.

Facts- The assessee sold certain property situated at Kottivakkam for Rs.172 Lacs. The property was purchased on 20-05-2004 for Rs.23 Lacs. However, Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) was not offered to tax. The Ld. AO computed LTCG of

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31