Chennai ITAT upholds deletion of additions for undisclosed profit, expenses, and stock in textile firm’s AY 2018-19 assessment following survey.
Patna High Court held that extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Sub-Section (1) of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 in as much as transactions were not disclosed in ST-3 and relevant information were not provided to taxing authority.
ITAT Rajkot held that the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act has been issued without obtaining the approval as prescribed under amended provision of section 151 of the Act is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
Patna High Court held that order passed by the State Authority sustained since that there is no violation of principles of natural justice much less any violation of the statutory provisions as contained in sub-section (4) of Section 75 of the CGST/ BGST Act, 2017.
The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS for the reasons i.e., abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period as compared to pre-demonetization period.
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of share premium under section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act not sustainable since shares are allotted to an existing shareholder and hence creditworthiness cannot be doubted. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Kolkata held that CIT(A) accepted additional evidence and allowed the relief u/s. 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act without allowing an opportunity of being heard to AO. Therefore, the order of CIT(A) is in contravention of Rule 46A(3) of the I.T. Rules, 1962.
ITAT Jaipur held that without considering the merits of the dispute and without verifying the veracity of the documents, the documents signed by third party cannot be directly held to be colorable devise. Accordingly, matter remanded to AO for due verification.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that weighted deduction under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act rightly disallowed as donation is given to Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust who doesn’t have valid registration. Accordingly, appeal of assessee dismissed.
Allahabad High Court sets aside a tax demand against Vibhuti Tyres, citing a violation of Section 75(7) of the GST Act as the final demand exceeded the show-cause notice amount.
