Further, the balance of convenience also lies in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. Great prejudice shall be caused to the plaintiff if interim relief is not granted to the plaintiff.
Gujarat High Court held that levy of Compensation Cess at the rate of 160% on the supply of goods i.e. branded tobacco products supplied to merchant exporters for export is kept in abeyance and the matter is referred to GST Council to decide the issue.
Delhi High Court didn’t entertain the writ petition in the matter of fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit without actual supply of goods or services since appellate remedy under section 107 of the CGST Act available.
ITAT Kolkata held that notice issued u/s. 143(2) of the Income Tax Act without specifying whether it is limited or complete of compulsory manual scrutiny is invalid and in violation of CBDT instruction F. No. 225/157/2017/ITA-II Dated 23-06-2017.
NCLAT Delhi held that rejection of approved resolution plan on account of alleged fraud without giving an opportunity to resolution applicant to explain its position is against the principle of natural justice. Accordingly, matter remanded back.
During the course of assessement proceedings, AO noted that the assessee has earned interest income on fixed deposits made with banks which has been included in the business income while computing deduction u/s 10AA of the Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that the cash deposited is out of the gross receipts and that once gross receipts are disputed then no addition is sustainable under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, appeal allowed to that extent and addition deleted.
Madras High Court held that based on auditor’s advice, the petitioner failed to comply with GST return provisions. Accordingly, reasons provided for non-compliance with GST provisions appears to be genuine and hence order cancelling registration set aside.
Gujarat High Court rules exporters can claim refund of compensation cess on inputs for goods exported on payment of IGST, overruling department’s denial.
CESTAT Mumbai reduces penalty on importer for lacking special license in 2000, citing failure to verify profit margin as directed & SC judgment.
