The Calcutta High Court invalidates a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) because the show-cause notice failed to specify whether the charge was for concealing or furnishing inaccurate income particulars.
Read the full ITAT Indore order on an assessee’s appeal dismissed for a 3-year delay. The court examined reasons for the late filing and rejected the plea for condonation.
The ITAT Ranchi has ruled that an Assessing Officer cannot reopen an assessment based on “reason to suspect,” distinguishing it from “reason to believe.”
The ITAT Chandigarh ruled that a penalty notice without a specific charge is invalid, leading to the deletion of a penalty under Section 271AAB.
The ITAT Chandigarh deleted additions under Section 153A, ruling that an assessment cannot be reopened without incriminating material found during a search.
The Mumbai ITAT ruled that under Section 50C(3), the stamp duty value prevails over a higher DVO valuation. Learn how this impacts capital gains tax.
A Chandigarh hospital’s Rs.3.91 crore tax addition is remanded for reassessment after a faulty software report skewed patient data, causing a major tax dispute.
The Ahmedabad ITAT has ruled that Section 87A rebate is applicable on STCG under Section 111A for taxpayers with income below ₹7,00,000. Learn how this decision impacts you.
Kerala High Court held that dismissal of stay petition on the ground of failure to comply with a non-existing condition precedent is perverse and requires interference. Accordingly, writ admitted and order set aside.
ITAT Mumbai held that entire bogus purchases can never be treated as income only profit element embedded in the accommodation entry is to be brought to tax. Accordingly, order of CIT(A) restricting disallowance @12.5% justified.
