Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhrub Narayan Parihast Vs ITO (ITAT Ranchi)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-2010
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dhrub Narayan Parihast Vs ITO (ITAT Ranchi) Reopening on “Reason to Suspect” quashed – No Reassessment without Tangible Material; Suspicion is Not Belief- ITAT Ranchi quashes reopening based on Mere Suspicion Ranchi ITAT has quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147, holding that the reasons recorded by AO were nothing but a case of “reason to suspect” & not “reason to believe.” Assessee, who was working as Head Pujari in Shiv Temple, was subjected to reopening of assessment for AY 2009-10. AO recorded reasons based upon an investigation report of the DDIT (Inv.)...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031