Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rahul Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rahul Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) No Specific Charge, No Penalty- Defective Notice Dooms Revenue: ITAT Chandigarh Deletes 271AAB Penalty Pursuant to search action on assessee on 29-09-2015, Assessee made surrender of cash &  bullion. Assessee filed return of income declaring income of Rs.326.90 Lacs which was accepted by  AO. However, AO initiated penalty u/s 271AAB on the allegation that Assessee failed to substantiate the manner in which the undisclosed income was derived. During the course of penalty proceedings, a SCN  was issued to Assessee proposing levy of penalty. Though Asse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930