ITAT Delhi following the decision of Delhi HC in assessee’s own case held that profit earned on sale/redemption of investment is not chargeable to tax. Accordingly, appeal allowed to that extent.
ITAT Chennai held that the amount gifted by the brother cannot be treated as unexplained. Accordingly, addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act deleted to that extent. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed.
The ITAT Bangalore has ruled that a charitable trust’s spending on land and building is for charitable purposes. Learn how this decision affects trust registration and tax exemptions in India.
Supreme Court ruled that documents like a GPA and an unproven Will cannot transfer property title. The case reinforces principle that a registered sale deed is mandatory.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that non-mentioning of Document Identification Number [DIN] in show cause notice uploaded on GST portal requires quashing of show cause notice. Accordingly, writ disposed of.
Assesee registered under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017/Assam Goods and Services Tax (AGST) Act, 2017. Present petition is preferred by the petitioner/ assessee mainly contesting cancellation of GST registration.
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that the penalty notice was invalid because it failed to specify whether the penalty was for ‘concealment of income’ or ‘furnishing inaccurate particulars’.
It is settled proposition of law that CBDT circulars are binding on department and it has to be strictly followed by officers of department. AO cannot be permitted to travel beyond the issues for which case was selected for limited scrutiny without taking mandatory permission from concerned PCIT or Pr.CCIT.
Even if a house property is vacant for the whole of the current year, but it is let out in earlier years, then benefit of vacancy allowance u/s 23(1)(c) must be allowed and no addition towards notional rent can be made by applying section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act 1961. Vivek Jain v ACIT [337 ITR 74 (AP)] distinguished.
ITAT Chennai held that delay of 373 days in filing of an appeal due to prolonged hospitalization and surgery and ultimate demise of Chartered Accountant handling tax matter is reasonable cause and hence condoned. Further, matter remitted since disallowance towards employee contribution to ESI/PF needs to be factually verified.
