ITAT Delhi upheld the quashing of Ashish Gupta’s reassessment, citing the AO’s failure to issue Section 143(2) notice and furnish reasons, reinforcing procedural compliance.
Supreme Court directs a petitioner to approach the GST Council regarding a mechanism to track and verify GST compliance by foreign OIDAR service providers.
Delhi High Court denies a trader’s GST refund petition, citing the cancellation of their GST registration and a failure to disclose this key information.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that when a best judgment assessment is conducted, the assessee has the burden to prove that the tax authorities’ findings are perverse.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a challenge to a SARFAESI Act notice, directing the petitioners to use the statutory remedies available under the Act.
The ITAT Mumbai has set aside a Rs. 2.55 crore tax order against Gemini Dyeing and Printing Mills, ruling the company was denied a reasonable opportunity for hearing.
ITAT Pune rules penalty cannot be levied under Section 270A if assessee, unaware of consultant’s fraud, paid tax before Section 148 notice, demonstrating good faith.
Delhi High Court halts coercive recovery for Shiningkart’s GST interest demand, noting overlapping claims from state and central authorities for the same period.
Delhi High Court directs authorities to accept and re-hear L&T’s rectification application for a ₹2.38 crore GST demand, citing a prior dismissal without hearing and data availability.
ITAT Delhi quashes a Rs. 418 crore reassessment order for AY 2009-10 because the notice for reopening under Section 148 was not validly served on the assessee.
