there has been continued dumping of the subject goods from People’s Republic of China and the dumping is likely to continue and increase if the anti-dumping duty is allowed to cease;
WHEREAS in the matter of Meta Phenylene Diamine (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under Chapter 29 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), originating in, or exported from the People’s Republic of
It seeks to extend levy of anti-dumping duty imposed vide Notification No. 15/2008-Customs, dated the 5th February, 2008, on imports of ‘Flexible Slabstock Polyol’, originating in, or exported from, United States of America and Japan, upto and inclusive of 4th February, 2014.
Notification No. 58/2012-Customs (ADD) New Delhi, the 24th December, 2012 G.S.R. 924 (E). –WHEREAS in the matter of Phthalic Anhydride (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under Chapter 29 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), originating in, or exported from, Korea RP, Taiwan (Chinese Taipei) and […]
G.S.R._(E). -WHEREAS in the matter of import of Choline Chloride (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under Chapter 23 or Chapter 29 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act), originating in, or exported from, the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the subject country),and imported into India, the designated authority in its final findings published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, vide notification No. 14/19/2011-DGAD, dated the 4th October, 2012, has come to the conclusion, inter alia, that –
Notification No. 56/2012-Customs (ADD) Seeks to modify final anti-dumping duty on imports of Cable Ties, originating in, or exported from the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan and imported into India, imposed vide Notification No. 44/2009-Customs dated 30th April, 2009
Notification No.55 /2012-Customs (ADD) Seeks to levy anti-dumping duty on imports of Sodium Hydrosulphite, originating in, or exported from People’s Republic of China, for a further period of five years
G.S.R.889 (E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rules 18, 20 and 22 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury)
G.S.R. 888(E). – Whereas, in the matter of import of Vitrified Porcelain Tiles (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under Chapter 69 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act) and originating in, or exported from the People’s Republic of China (China PR) and United Arab Emirates (UAE) (hereinafter referred to as the subject countries), the designated authority, vide its final findings in notification No.37/1/2001-DGAD, dated the 5 th February, 2003 in the original anti-dumping case published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 5 th February, 2003 had come to the conclusion that—
G.S.R. 881 (E).-WHEREAS, the designated authority vide notification No. 21/29/2011-DGAD, dated the 5th October, 2012, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 5th October, 2012, had initiated review, in terms of sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) read with rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, in the matter of continuation of anti-dump
