SEBI : Explains the ruling that compliance officers cannot be penalised for financial misstatements without clear legal duty or proof of ...
SEBI : Explore the impact of the redesignation of independent directors in the SAT ruling - SecureKloud Technologies Limited vs. SEBI. A ...
CA, CS, CMA : It is ripe time for ICAI to take initiative and show leadership in conveying and educating the investors, regulators and other sta...
SEBI : Enclosed is the list of minimum periodic compliances to be done by a Listed Entity pursuant to the provisions of the Companies Act...
SEBI : Comparative analysis between listing agreement and Chapter IV of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulation...
SEBI : NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today directed Sahara Group firm Sahara India Real Estate Corp to approach the Securities Appellate T...
Finance : Telecom tribunal TDSAT today asked another new operator Videocon Telecom to pay 60 per cent of Rs 12.45 crore penalty slapped on i...
SEBI : The Union Cabinet today approved amendments to the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act 1952 by introducing the Forward Contracts (...
SEBI : Takeovers are set to get costlier with a Sebi panel favouring making it mandatory for the acquirer to make an offer for up to 100 ...
SEBI : The market watchdog Sebi today moved the Supreme Court challenging the decision of the appellate tribunal SAT that held that finan...
SEBI : Explore recent SAT verdict in 20 Microns Limited v. BSE Limited case on Regulation 17(1A) of LODR. Learn about implications and a ...
SEBI : Dive into the Shreehas P Tambe vs. SEBI case, exploring insider trading regulations, violations, legalities, and the significant ...
SEBI : Regulation 17(1A) is not applicable for the purpose of filling up a casual vacancy under Section 161(4) of the Companies Act. Reg...
SEBI : In the present case, the appellant neither put a plea of prejudice before the AO nor before us. It was simply stated that since th...
SEBI : Advance Lifestyles Ltd. Vs BSE Ltd. (Securities Appellate Tribunal) Appellant made a representation to the authorities requesting ...
M/s New Delhi Television Limited Vs SEBI (SAT Mumbai) SAT upheld the order of SEBI penalising the Company and its Directors for non- disclosure of tax demand on the grounds that any information which have effect on the operations of the Company is price sensitive and must be disclosed immediately to the Stock exchange. However, […]
Price Waterhouse & Co. Bangalore LLP Vs SEBI (Securities Appellate Tribunal) 1. By this Miscellaneous Application Applicants / Original Appellants seek extension of the period of interim relief granted by this Appellate Tribunal vide order dated 15.02.2018. By the said order Applicants /Appellants were allowed to continue with the auditing assignments of their existing clients […]
In one of the recent rulings of the SAT, Mumbai, the interim order passed by SEBI in the matter of Neesa Technologies Limited(Company) has been quashed qua one of the directors i.e. Mr. Nimain Charan Biswal who had joined and resigned from the directorship of the Company before the issuance of Non-convertible Debentures (NCDs),the subject matter of the case.
Enclosed is the list of minimum periodic compliances to be done by a Listed Entity pursuant to the provisions of the Companies Act and SEBI Regulations.
Comparative analysis between listing agreement and Chapter IV of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015- Transfer or transmission of securities and issue certificates within 15 days from the date of such receipt of request for transfer.
CS Amey A Patwardhan Quarterly Compliances for listed Companies for the Quarter Ended Q4- Jan‘15 to Mar’15 Sl. No. Compliances / Filings Last Date 1 Shareholding Pattern- to be submitted to BSE / NSE- both physically & electronically – through NEAPS within 21 days of end of quarter. (Clause 35 of Listing Agreement) 21-April […]
Regulation 4 appears under Chapter II providing common conditions for public issues and rights issues. It prescribes general conditions meaning thereby that unless the requirements laid down in these general conditions are satisfied, the Board will not proceed with granting its clearance for the issue of capital. These conditions must be satisfied not only at the time of filing of draft offer document with the Board but also at the time of registering or filing the final offer document with the Registrar of Companies or designated stock exchange, as the case may be.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today directed Sahara Group firm Sahara India Real Estate Corp to approach the Securities Appellate Tribunal against market regulator SEBI’s order directing the return of money collected from investors for an OFCD scheme within a period of three weeks.A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia also directed the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) to decide Sahara India Real Estate Corp’s appeal against SEBI within a period of eight weeks.
Telecom tribunal TDSAT today asked another new operator Videocon Telecom to pay 60 per cent of Rs 12.45 crore penalty slapped on it by the Department of Telecom for missing roll-out obligations, while admitting its appeal against DoT.
Where the details in the charts relied upon in the show-cause notice have been culled out from the trade and order logs and, in the circumstances of the case, it was not only relevant but even necessary that the appellant be furnished with those trade and order logs so that she could possibly make out a case based on other orders punched into the system, non-furnishing of the trade and order logs to the appellant in the circumstances of this case resulted in the violation of the principles of natural justice
