#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

No Penalty for Concealment of Income on Ad-hoc Addition reduced by ITAT

No penalty for disallowance due to dispute on nature of expenses

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable on addition due to difference of opinion

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on highly debatable issue is unsustainable

Section 271(1)(c) penalty not Leviable on Deletion of Quantum Addition

Compensation paid by builder during redevelopment of flats is capital receipt

Penalty cannot be imposed on additions purely based on estimation of income

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable as deduction claimed under bonafide belief

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty not sustainable if notice is vague & ambiguous

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) up to 100% of tax evaded justified in case of excess stock found during survey

Additions on the basis of incriminating material obtained during survey is justified

Penalty Notice without Striking Off Irrelevant Limb is defective notice

Depreciation claim could not be decided until decision regarding capitalization of expenses in assessment order

Section 271(1)(c) penalty cannot be levied if ITAT deletes quantum addition
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
