Case Law Details
DCIT Vs Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Ahmedabad held that when application of income is more than receipts of year, excess application of income i.e., expenditure in the hands of the assessee can be carried forward to succeeding Year.
Facts- The present appeal is preferred by the revenue contesting that whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) is justified in allowing the assessee’s appeal, negating the finding of the Assessing officer denying the benefits of section 11 and 12 of the I.T. Act.
Further, appeal is also preferred by the assessee raising various contentions.
Conclusion- Gujarat High Court judgment in assessee’s own case and thereby held that the assessee cannot be considered to cover by the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act and cannot withdraw the claim of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act to the assessee.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.