Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Skyline Greathills Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Skyline Greathills Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld In this cross-appeal, the ITAT dealt with three major issues—(i) enhancement by CIT(A), (ii) deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e), and (iii) addition on JDA valuation. 1. Enhancement by CIT(A)- Held Invalid The CIT(A) reduced WIP by ~₹11.97 crore on the ground that income disclosed during survey was neutralized by capitalization. However, the ITAT held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income by introducing a new issue/source not examined by the AO, as per settled law (Shapoorji ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031