#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Reopening Based Only on Change of Opinion Is Not Permissible: ITAT Chennai

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Invalid as Notice Lacked Specific Charge: ITAT Mumbai

Offshore Supply Non-Taxable as No PE Was Proven in India: ITAT Delhi

Appeals Restored Because CIT(A) Ignored Request to Avoid Email Notices

Search-Based Penalties Collapsed: Additions Were Only Disallowances, Not Undisclosed Income

ITAT Pune: ₹1.62 Cr u/s 68 Deleted — No “Source of Source” Needed Pre-01.04.2023

Penalty Cannot Survive on Estimated Bogus Purchase Addition: ITAT Deletes 271(1)(c)

Escapement Below ₹50L: ITAT Quashes 148 Notice Issued After 3 Years

Only First 142(1) Default Penalizable: ITAT Slashes Penalty and Sends Other Issues Back

Tribunal Deletes ₹2.14 Crore Addition Due to Invalid Pre-Notification NFAC Action

CIT(A) Had No Material to Examine – Assessee Gets Final Opportunity to Prove Capital Source

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Invalid Due to Ambiguous Satisfaction Recorded by AO

Misapplied Circular 19/2017: Commercial Transaction Ignored – Tribunal Remands 2(22)(e) Addition

DRP failed to adjudicate objections of assessee hence matter remitted back
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
