Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Omax Minerals Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Omax Minerals Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) Principle of Natural Justice Reinforced: Appeal Restored for Fresh Consideration Assessee faced a survey u/s 133A at its business premises, followed by a search u/s 132 at related group concerns. Consequently, a notice u/s 153C was issued. Assessee treated its original return u/s 139 as filed u/s 153C. On scrutiny, AO made an addition of ₹4,37,260 as unaccounted expenditure, resulting in assessed income of ₹2.87 crore. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) were initiated for concealment/inaccurate particulars. Since the assessee did not respond to no...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930