Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Omax Minerals Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Omax Minerals Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) Principle of Natural Justice Reinforced: Appeal Restored for Fresh Consideration Assessee faced a survey u/s 133A at its business premises, followed by a search u/s 132 at related group concerns. Consequently, a notice u/s 153C was issued. Assessee treated its original return u/s 139 as filed u/s 153C. On scrutiny, AO made an addition of ₹4,37,260 as unaccounted expenditure, resulting in assessed income of ₹2.87 crore. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) were initiated for concealment/inaccurate particulars. Since the assessee did not respond to no...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930