Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata condoned appeal delay, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and remanded the assessment for fresh adjudication after grantin...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that a 50-year lease is not a transfer under Section 2(47)(vi) where the transaction is only a lease and not an a...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad allowed Section 10(10B) exemption on BSNL VRS compensation, following coordinate bench rulings despite no claim in ...
Income Tax : ITAT held an assessment passed after the taxpayer's death was invalid in law, quashed the order, and treated all remaining issues ...
The Bangalore ITAT deleted disallowance on transport expenses incurred across India through drivers and local agents. The ruling emphasized that practical realities of the transport industry cannot be ignored while assessing business expenditure.
Bangalore ITAT held that once ownership of agricultural land and cultivation activities are accepted, reasonable agricultural income cannot be rejected altogether. The Tribunal allowed relief for income from rubber plantation activities.
Tribunal ruled that market value for captive power consumption must be based on the tariff charged to industrial consumers by TNEB while computing deduction under Section 80IA.
ITAT Indore held that delayed filing of Form 10E due to Covid-19 related circumstances should not automatically deny substantive relief under Section 89 if the assessee is otherwise eligible.
Ahmedabad ITAT held that cost of improvement could not be disallowed solely because suppliers’ VAT registrations were later cancelled retrospectively. The Tribunal remanded the matter for verification of supporting purchase and transportation documents.
The Tribunal noted that an adjustment under Section 35(1)(iv), already dropped during CPC processing, was later included in assessment computation without fresh notice to the assessee.
The Tribunal held that accounting treatment in the Profit and Loss Account does not determine taxability of a receipt. Principal loan waiver remained non-taxable despite being shown as extraordinary income in accounts.
The Tribunal rejected the Department’s argument that BSNL VRS payments were only voluntary retirement benefits. It held that the compensation fell within Section 10(10B) as retrenchment compensation.
Mumbai ITAT held that discounts offered on gift cards and gift vouchers became an actual expenditure when the instruments were sold and could not be treated as contingent liability. The Tribunal allowed the deduction after noting that unutilised amounts were later offered to tax.
The Tribunal held that the facts relating to delayed revised return in Shriram Investments were distinguishable and therefore did not bar consideration of the assessee’s agricultural land exemption claim.
