Income Tax : One can set up either a public charitable trust, a registered society, or a Section 8 Company (a trust corporation). Each has it...
Company Law : Under Section 2(18) of the Income tax a company is said to be a company in which the public are substantially interested in the fo...
Income Tax : NGO’s or charity work in India can be carried out by various methods/forms of business, such as a Trust/ A society or by a Non-P...
Finance : Forming a, Trust or a Society, or a Company Generally speaking, any organisation that devotes its funds for public welfare is a no...
Company Law : Objectives of Company proposed to be formed under Section 8 of Companies Act 2013 should be to promote commerce, art, science, sp...
Company Law : Government is planning to relax exit norms for not-for-profit companies to allow them to de-register without having to follow cumb...
Company Law : The government today eased rules for incorporating not-for-profit companies, by giving the Registrar of companies the power to dir...
CA, CS, CMA : As you may be aware that the ICAI has taken a lead role in the development and promotion of XBRL in India and has accordingly set ...
Company Law : The government is planning to permit corporate houses to set up higher educational institutions -- like multi-disciplinary univers...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court set aside a GST demand after finding that the assessing officer failed to consider binding CBIC circulars cl...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that the Successful Resolution Applicant [SRA] cannot be forced to deal with claims that are not a part of the ...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Hyderabad held that exemption notification no. 57/2000 issued u/s. 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 prevails over CBEC circular ...
Corporate Law : NCLT Chennai held that as per section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, the liability of guarantor is coextensive with that of the B...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Delhi held that customs authorities cannot question the discharge certificate issued by DGFT in respect of the export oblig...
Company Law : Proposed guidelines for conversion of section 25 company (non profit company) to an ordinary company under Companies Act, 1956. -...
The Madras High Court set aside a GST demand after finding that the assessing officer failed to consider binding CBIC circulars clarifying valuation of corporate guarantees. The case was remanded for reconsideration. The ruling reinforces the requirement for authorities to adhere to departmental circulars.
Supreme Court held that the Successful Resolution Applicant [SRA] cannot be forced to deal with claims that are not a part of the Request for Resolution Plan [RfRP] issued in terms of Section 25 of the IBC or a part of its Resolution Plan.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that exemption notification no. 57/2000 issued u/s. 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 prevails over CBEC circular and hence since exemption notification does not stipulate that only imported gold should be used to manufacture goods for export there is no such requirement.
NCLT Chennai held that as per section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, the liability of guarantor is coextensive with that of the Borrower. Accordingly, application u/s. 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against Corporate Guarantor admitted.
CESTAT Delhi held that customs authorities cannot question the discharge certificate issued by DGFT in respect of the export obligation in respect of EPCG License. Accordingly, confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty set aside.
Kerala High Court held that no taxable event under the provisions of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act [KVAT Act] had occurred in respect of displaying advertisement on hoardings as there was no transfer of right to use the hoardings. Accordingly, writ disposed of.
The responsibility for recovering unpaid tax lies properly and primarily with the tax authorities, who must proceed against the defaulting seller, rather than against the innocent purchasing dealer who has fulfilled all obligations imposed by the Act.
Jharkhand High Court enhanced the amount of permanent alimony by directing to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000 per month to wife who has no other source of income and Rs. 40,000 per month to son who is suffering from Autism.
Madras High Court held that denial of benefit of Notification No. 153/93-Cus dated 13.08.1993 to Software Technology Park on imports undertaken prior to CMDA approval not justified as substantial requirement of notification satisfied.
CESTAT Delhi held that since Assembly Front imported qualifies as ‘Display Assembly’ used in manufacture of cellular mobile phones, the same would be entitled to exemption from duty of customs under clause 6(a)(iv) of the Customs Notification 57/2017 dated 30.06.2017.
