TaxGuru Newsletter Subscription
Information You Can Rely On.
Income Tax - We see many big business houses run by second or third generation families with different ideologies or intending to diversify their businesses. Occasionally, it leads to separation of business and to family disputes. While most settle the issues amongst themselves, some families drag them to court....
Read MoreIncome Tax - Under the existing provisions of the Act, conversion of security from one form to another is regarded as transfer for the purpose of levy of capital gains tax. However, tax neutrality to the conversion of bond or debenture of a company to share or debenture of that company is provided under the section 47. ...
Read MoreIncome Tax - Under clause (vib) of section 47 of the Income-tax Act any capital asset transferred by the demerged company to the resulting company in the scheme of demerger is not regarded as transfer if the resulting company is an Indian company. In such cases the cost of such asset in the hands of resulting company should be cost of such asset in th...
Read MoreJyoti Rakesh Kapoor Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) - Jyoti Rakesh Kapoor Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We find merits in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that the assessee has gifted her 50% share in the property in favour of her brother in law in pursuance of family arrangement between the family members for acquiring separate property for each f...
Read MoreM/s Mangilall Estates (P) Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) - Under section 2(47)(v ) any transaction involving allowing of possession to be taken over or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the 1882 Act would come within the ambit of section 2(47)(v). ...
Read MoreCIT Vs. Dr. Arvind S. Phake (Bombay High Court) - Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The challenge is to the judgement and order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench A at Pune (for short Appellate Tribunal) on 30th April, 2014. The substantial questions of law which are placed into service are the questions wh...
Read MoreRukiyabanu Gullam Mohiuddin Ahmedji & Anr. Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) - Admittedly, possession of the property was not handed over during assessment year 2008-09 and mere execution of agreement for the development of the property could not amount to transfer under section 2(47) of the Act row with section 53A of the transfer of property Act are satisfied as such there c...
Read MoreY.V. Ramana Vs CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) - In the case of shares of unlisted companies, transfer would take place, only when valid share transfer form in form no. 7B is delivered to the company and endorsed by the Company. Therefore, for effective transfer of shares a mere agreement for transfer of shares is not sufficient, unless it is phys...
Read MoreJyoti Rakesh Kapoor Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) -
M/s Mangilall Estates (P) Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) -
CIT Vs. Dr. Arvind S. Phake (Bombay High Court) -
Rukiyabanu Gullam Mohiuddin Ahmedji & Anr. Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) -
Y.V. Ramana Vs CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) -
C.S. Atwal Vs CIT (Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh) -
ACIT Vs Shri N. Prasad (ITAT Hyderabad) -
