Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bileshivale Muddanna Govardhana Murthy Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Bileshivale Muddanna Govardhana Murthy Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) No Capital Gains on JDA Amid Family Dispute; Additions Based on Statement Alone Unsustainable – ITAT Bangalore In this case, the ITAT Bangalore delivered a detailed ruling covering multiple issues across two assessment years. (1) Capital Gains on Joint Development Agreement (JDA): The Tribunal held that no transfer occurred under Section 2(47) in the year of entering into the JDA. Although extensive rights and GPA were granted to the developer, subsequent family disputes and a civil court partition decree materially altered ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031