Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that satisfaction for initiating action against other persons in search cases must be recorded promptly. ...
Income Tax : The High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 were time-barred after computing the surviving limitation as clar...
Income Tax : Budget 2026 introduces sweeping retrospective amendments affecting limitation, reassessment jurisdiction, DIN validity, and TPO ti...
Income Tax : The new reassessment framework mandates enquiry, hearing, and a reasoned order before reopening. Courts now test jurisdiction on p...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Corporate Law : Non- extension of the Time Barring Date for assessment of reopened cases and issuance of the notices for reopening – difficu...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : The Court held that the petitioner had no connection with the entities or individuals from whose devices the disputed material was...
Income Tax : Court upheld the validity of the Section 148 notice but set aside the assessment order after finding that notices were sent to an ...
Income Tax : Tribunal reiterated that credits brought forward from earlier financial years cannot ordinarily be taxed under Section 68 in subse...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings cannot be sustained on changing allegations introduced after issuance of n...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
Learn about the Madras High Court’s landmark ruling quashing an income tax reassessment notice for a medical professional under Section 44ADA. Find out why proper classification of professional services is crucial.
Read the Kerala High Court’s judgment in Johnson Koomullil Thomas vs ITO under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act. Discover why the court nullified the order due to procedural flaws.
Rajasthan HC rules that using the Insight Portal for reopening income tax assessments under Section 148 is valid. Learn about Chaturbhuj Gattani vs. ITO case details.
Explore the detailed analysis of the Calcutta High Court judgment in Pratima Halder Vs Union of India on challenges to Income Tax Act notices and orders for AY 2020-21.
It is trite that under guise of power vested in Revenue to reassess an income which had escaped assessment upon production of fresh tangible material, it cannot be allowed to exercise power of review.
Read the detailed analysis of Coonoor Sri Thanthi Mariamman Kerala Seva Sangam vs Assessment Unit judgment by Madras High Court. Learn why the court overturned the assessment order due to a breach of natural justice.
Karnataka High Court rules assessment orders against deceased null and void. Review of SMT. Sowmya S Vs ITO case, implications, and legal insights.
Court upheld legality of initiating proceedings under Section 148A(d) based on information suggesting potential income discrepancies, leaving further assessment to be conducted by statutory authorities.
Discover the ITAT Chennai verdict on Santhilal Jain Vijay Kumar Vs ITO, addressing taxation on excess stock and unexplained marriage expenses. Read the full case analysis.
The court held that while the information prompting the notice must be disclosed to the assessee, the detailed material or evidence need not be supplied at the initial stage. The court emphasized that Section 148A aims to provide a preliminary opportunity to the assessee, ensuring that reassessment proceedings are not initiated arbitrarily or without sufficient basis.
