Income Tax : he framework establishes that the correctness of a TRO-issued certificate cannot be disputed by the assessee. This ensures finalit...
Income Tax : Form 153 is issued when tax dues remain unpaid, triggering a 15-day deadline for payment. The key takeaway is that non-compliance ...
Income Tax : Income-tax attachments can halt business and personal finances. Relief depends on identifying the correct legal trigger and pursui...
Income Tax : This article explains how recovery notices can quickly lead to bank or salary attachments if ignored. It highlights the importance...
Income Tax : Discover the implications of sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and articles of the Constitution of India in tax assessments an...
Income Tax : India's tax arrears stand at ₹47 lakh crore as of Dec 2024. CBDT & CBIC are taking steps, including asset identification, litiga...
Corporate Law : CAG's audit highlights inefficiencies in recovering ₹8.5 lakh crore of outstanding income tax demands. Key issues: inflated dema...
Income Tax : KSCAA Representation regarding adjustments (over and above 20% of disputed demand) by CPC despite assessments pending before first...
Income Tax : Grievances and suggestions with respect to the functioning of Demand Facilitation Center, CPC (DFC) in connection to the outstandi...
Income Tax : The Central Board of Direct Taxes had issued directions to the field offices that taxpayers whose tax has been deducted at source ...
Corporate Law : Kerala High Court ruled tenants with separate leases can file joint SARFAESI applications, emphasizing broad interpretation of "an...
Income Tax : Explore Bhailal Babubhai Patel Vs PCIT case in Gujarat High Court. Learn why a valid show-cause notice is crucial for recovery und...
Income Tax : Delhi HC directs refund of Income Tax amount exceeding 20% of the demand. Read about the Max Life Insurance case and the decision ...
Income Tax : The issue under consideration is the rejection of stay of demand by the assessing authority without offering an opportunity of hea...
Income Tax : Pirna Urban Co-Oeprative Credit Society Ltd. Vs ITO (Bombay at Goa High Court) The issue under consideration is the notice issued ...
Income Tax : Corrigendum to Order under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 16.10.2020 for exercising power of intrusive or coercive ...
Goods and Services Tax : As we near the end of the Financial Year 2017-18, I would once again like to reiterate our need to focus on the recovery of arrear...
Income Tax : As per the Central Action Plan issued for the F.Y. 2017-18, all pending appeals having tax effect of Rs. 50 crore or more are to ...
Income Tax : On review of the progress of TDS collections it is noted that as on 31.08.2017, an amount of Rs. 1,65,114 crore has been collected...
Income Tax : A Committee of the following officers is hereby constituted to study the nature and extent of arrears of direct taxes and to sugge...
On review of the progress of TDS collections it is noted that as on 31.08.2017, an amount of Rs. 1,65,114 crore has been collected under TDS (Minor Head) at a growth rate of 10.44% over corresponding period of last financial year. It has shown a significant decline of 7 percent over the last financial year when the growth rate at this time was 17.44%.
A Committee of the following officers is hereby constituted to study the nature and extent of arrears of direct taxes and to suggest measures for expeditious recovery of the outstanding dues:
High Court held that Considering the Office Memorandum F. No. 404/72/93- ITCC dated 29thFebruary 2016 as a whole, there is no such requirement of pre-deposit of 15% of the disputed demand either at the time of submitting stay application or before the stay application of the assessee is considered on merits.
Rule made returnable forthwith. The learned Counsel for the respondent, waives service. Heard finally by consent of parties. The petitioner is a Company engaged in the business of manufacturing base station antennas, microwave antennas, R.F. cables, jumpers and connectors and trading in related products.
On review of the position of collection out of arrear and current demand as on 28.02.2017, it is noted that the performance of the Department as a whole and of almost all Pr. CCIT Regions individually is much below the targets given in the Central Action Plan 2016-17.
This appeal, filed by the assessee, being ITA No. 971/Mum/2016 for assessment year 2011-12 has come up for hearing today i.e. 23-02.2017 whereby ld. Counsel Shri Hiten Chande,CA on behalf of the assessee and Mrs. Malathi Sridharan, CIT DR on behalf of the Revenue were present. The Assessing officer was also present during the course of hearing.
With a view to concentrate all efforts towards the objective of achieving the budget target, you are requested to personally review and monitor the position of collections through advance tax, TDS and recovery from arrear and current demand of your Region on a weekly basis. I have separately written D.O. letters on stepping up efforts for recovery from arrear demand, collection out of current demand and collection from TDS, which may be followed scrupulously by all officers engaged in the work of assessment and collection.
Time-barring date of scrutiny assessment was advanced to 31st December to provide assessment units with a dedicated quarter for recovery of demand raised.
It may be pointed out that the target of cash collection from arrear demand was fixed very modestly at Rs.53,981 crore in the Central Action Plan for 2016-17 as against very large amount of arrears outstanding. However. till the end of November, 2016
As per Section 11D(1) of Central excise Act 1944, brought under the statute book w.e.f. 20.9.1991, every person, who is liable to pay duty under the Act and has collected any amount in excess of the duty assessed or determined and paid on any excisable goods under the Act from the buyer of such goods in any manner as representing duty of excise is required to pay the amount so collected to the credit of the Central Govt.
