Follow Us :

Case Law Details

Case Name : MSM Discovery Private Limited Vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 971/Mum/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/02/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12

in this case, there is a very high demand i.e. more than 150 crores which is still outstanding to be payable by the assessee and the stay of demand was granted by the tribunal on the condition that the assessee will not seek adjournment except on genuine and bonafide reasons.

The assessee has now come up with the additional grounds in relation to arithmetical inaccuracy in the workings provided in the DRP order which grounds are already covered by ground No. 1 and ground 12 to 14 which were already filed before the tribunal in the appeal memo as also admitted by the assessee and the assessee has requested for admission of the these additional grounds vide letter dated 23­02-2017.

The assessee counsel has insisted on granting adjournment for today’s hearing despite knowingly well that this a direct flouting of the terms of stay of demand originally granted by the tribunal. This was brought to the notice of learned counsel for the assessee but he still insisted on grant of adjournment for today’s hearing.

The ld. CIT-D.R. categorically brought to our notice that these additional grounds can be argued today itself as they are covered by the existing grounds and does not have any significant bearing on the outcome of the appeal as they are only referring to some arithmetical in­accuracy in the order of the DRP.

However, the ld. Counsel for the assessee insisted for the adjournment despite being brought to his notice about consequences of seeking adjournment.

Thus, keeping in view factual matrix as discussed above, we hereby adjourn the hearing of the instant appeal in ITA No. 971/Mum/2016 for assessment year 2011-12 and fix the next date of hearing on 28-06-2017 which was announced in the open court in the presence of both the parties and at the same time we hereby vacate the stay of demand granted by the tribunal in SA No. 106/Mum/2016 vide order dated 18-03-2016 which stay of demand was further extended by the tribunal in SA No. 325/Mum/2016 arising out of ITA No. 971/Mum/2016 for assessment year 2011-12 vide orders dated 16.09.2016.

Thus, in nutshell the stay of outstanding demand against the assessee as existing as of date stood vacated forthwith immediately on pronouncement of the order by the tribunal in open court today i.e. 23-02-2017 in the presence of both the parties . The Assessing Officer was also present in the court. The order is pronounced in the open court in the presence of learned counsel for the assessee, learned CIT-DR and the Assessing Officer.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2024