Sabka Vishwas - (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019
Service Tax : SC held that assessee cannot be denied relief under SVLDR Scheme for not making payment of dues in prescribed time limit due to in...
Excise Duty : M/s. UCN Cable Network (P) Ltd. Vs. Designated Committee under SVLDR Scheme, 2019 (Bombay High Court, Nagpur) Completion Of Invest...
Finance : Cases involving confiscation/ redemption fine are within the ambit of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLD...
Income Tax : THE INTRODUCTION TO THE SCENARIO The fostering of the economic growth and development have been assured and accounted in the hands...
Excise Duty : Memorandum seeking a special measure for the opening of Limited Time Window to process of Payment of Taxes under Sabka Vishwas - (...
Excise Duty : As we all are aware that, SVLDRS was introduced with the twin objectives- First, finalize the legacy disputes in Central Excise ...
Excise Duty : Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme The details of total amount of funds that are locked up in cases at various q...
Excise Duty : Keeping in view the response of the taxpayers to the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, the Central Government toda...
Excise Duty : Directorate General of Taxpayer Services, Mumbai Zonal Unit, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs organized a Symposium on ...
Goods and Services Tax : Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs, held a press conference on the measures taken to boost ec...
Service Tax : Bombay HC upholds SVLDR Scheme eligibility for duty quantified before June 30, 2019, despite post-deadline notice issuance in Bram...
Service Tax : Bombay HC quashes rejection of Santosh Bhandarkar’s SVLDRS application, orders reconsideration based on admitted tax liability u...
Service Tax : Bombay HC directs SVLDRS-4 issuance to Cradle Runways Pvt. Ltd. despite a one-day payment delay under the SVLDR Scheme, citing tec...
Service Tax : Bombay High Court upheld the petitioner's claim that the director's statement quantifies tax dues, making them eligible for the SV...
Service Tax : Bombay High Court remanded the SVLDRS-3 order due to non-compliance with natural justice principles, restoring the matter for re-v...
Excise Duty : CBIC-6/1 /2021 -CX-VI Section-CBEC Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Tax &am...
Excise Duty : In cases where assessee has filed ST-3 return on or before 30.6.2019 and has paid the tax dues in full before filing application, ...
Excise Duty : CBIC instruction on Manual processing of declarations filed by the co-noticees under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Sch...
Excise Duty : Manual processing of declaration filed under SVLDRS, 2019 in order to comply with the directions of the Hon'ble High Courts to the...
Excise Duty : Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (Removal of Difficulties) order 2020 dated 13th Nov.,2020- procedure for fi...
GE Power India Limited Vs Union of India & Ors (Calcutta High Court) HC held that impugned orders dated 12th February, 2020 rejecting the petitioner’s applications under the SVLDRS 2019, are arbitrary, invalid, perverse and not tenable in the eye of law for the following reasons: (i) On the date of filing of the applications […]
Virtusa Systems (India) Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) In this case issuance of form SVLDRS-3 was necessary, and it was not issued to the Petitioner due to the error on the part of the Respondents is an accepted position. The Petitioner therefore is entitled to a direction to the […]
Madras High Court held that as the petitioner proved that amount payable under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019 (SVLDRS) as per form SVLDRS-3 was paid on the due date, however, the amount was credit on the next day i.e. one pay after the due date. The application submitted by the petitioner under SVLDRS should be processed.
Delhi High Court held that amount payable under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 ( SVLDRS ) cannot be more than the amount confirmed vide Order-In-Original.
Petitioner submitted that it is not in dispute that the Petitioner falls in the category of case under Section 125(1)(f)(i) of Finance Act as on 30 June 2019, there was no enquiry/investigation pending against the Petitioner and at the most the same could be as initiated by way of notice dated 28 August 2019 by the Deputy Commissioner (Anti Evasion) CGST, Belapur.
Millenium Construction and Ors. Vs Designated Committee (Calcutta High Court) Honorable Calcutta High Court, Circuit bench at Jalpaiguri, in case no. WPA 3120 of 2022, order dated 08.02.2023 passed by the Honorable Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , quashed the penalty imposed on the petitioner and also directed to repay the amount and directed to issue the […]
Assessee allowed by HC to submit an additional reply to a SCN against non-payment of tax within prescribed period under SVLDRS
CBIC-6/1 /2021 -CX-VI Section-CBEC Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Tax & Customs (CX & ST Wing) Room No. 263-E, North Block, New Delhi, dated: 6th February, 2023 INSTRUCTION To, 1. The Principal Chief Commissioner/ Chief Commissioner of CGST & CE (All), 2. Director General, Directorate of System […]
National Centre for the Performing Arts Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) It is not in dispute that the Petitioner has, prior to the issuance of the show cause notice, paid an amount of Rs.1,49,35,618/- electronically out of which a sum of Rs.1,09,06,948/- was deposited under the Accounting Code 00441480 as tax receipts and […]
Jharkhand High Court held that benefit under SVLDRS scheme cannot be denied by the designated committee on the reason that department has decided to file an appeal against the OIO.
