Goods and Services Tax : A supplier cannot issue a GST credit note merely because the buyer has not paid the invoice. The proper remedy is to document the ...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how mandatory IMS and the Zero-Mismatch Policy require taxpayers to verify invoices before claiming ITC, maki...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how IMS makes accepted invoice records the basis for ITC eligibility, strengthening compliance, fraud detecti...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that retrospective cancellation of a supplier's GST registration alone is insufficient to deny ITC. Aut...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains why retrospective GST cancellation alone should not result in ITC denial where buyers have complied with Sect...
Goods and Services Tax : Representation addressed to Union Finance Minister, GST Council and CBIC seeks legislative and administrative relief for bona fide...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims based on fake invoices without actual supply of goods or services. The accused was arr...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST Delhi South arrested a director for allegedly availing ₹6.53 crore in fraudulent ITC based on bogus invoices worth ₹36.28...
Goods and Services Tax : Government advisories revised the IMS process to stop unfair tax escalation on credit note rejection. The key takeaway is balanced...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court set aside certain GST orders after holding that DRC-01 notice should have preceded adjudication following the ea...
Goods and Services Tax : Odisha AAR held that questions relating to refund of accumulated ITC under Section 54(3) are not maintainable under the advance ru...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court granted regular bail in a GST fraud prosecution after noting that the investigation had been completed, the complai...
Goods and Services Tax : The SC declined to interfere with the High Court ruling that Rule 86A cannot be used to create a negative Electronic Credit Ledger...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court held that Rule 86A permits blocking only of input tax credit actually available in the Electronic Credit Ledger. Ne...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has launched a standardized Annexure-B Offline Utility for refund applications involving accumulated ITC to enable automated ...
Goods and Services Tax : The portal will restrict GSTR-3B filing if ITC reclaims exceed ledger balances. The key takeaway is mandatory correction of excess...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi government allows registered taxpayers to rectify GST orders where previously denied ITC is now eligible under section 1...
Goods and Services Tax : Rajasthan GST circular directs officers to reject Input Tax Credit claims for taxpayers who register after 30 days from becoming l...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about the Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Department's new directive on verifying and rejecting Input Tax Credit claims for busin...
Delve into the realm of corporate guarantees in the GST domain. Learn about their nature, GST applicability, and implications for Indian and foreign entities.
Delhi High Court quashes order in Jullundur Motor Agency Delhi Limited vs. Union of India & Ors. Taxpayer’s detailed reply not considered; court emphasizes the importance of seeking clarification.
Read the detailed analysis of Madras High Court’s judgment in Richards & John Wesley Engineers Pvt Ltd. Vs Principal Chief Commissioner of GST & C.EX case, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles and directing the petitioner to approach the appellate authority.
Have you got an intimation in DRC-01C under Rule 88D for ITC mismatch between GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B? Understanding the reasons and how to respond Have you availed ITC higher than the amount auto-populated in GSTR-2B? If you have then the chances are you can receive an intimation in form DRC-01C under Rule 88D asking for […]
Madras High Court sets aside an order confirming Input Tax Credit (ITC) demand against Sanjai Gandhi without providing him a reasonable opportunity, directing a remand with conditions.
Delhi High Court sets aside an order denying Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to non-submission of documents not requested, directing re-adjudication.
Delhi High Court directs Manpowergroup Services India Pvt. Ltd. to respond to show cause notices regarding irregular input tax credit within 30 days. Full judgment provided.
Delhi High Court orders re-adjudication after finding the denial of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim without stating reasons unjust. Full judgment analysis provided.
Delhi High Court held that denial of input tax credit in respect of services where GST is payable on reverse charge basis, cannot by any stretch be held to be irrational and arbitrary. Thus, deny of input tax credit to service provider who is not liable to pay tax on output services is justified.
Absence of proper scrutiny and justification for rejecting petitioner’s ITC claims warranted the court to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter for re-adjudication.
