Case Law Details
Thillai Agencies Vs State of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court)
In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court addressed the contentious issue of Input Tax Credit (ITC) reversal in the case of Thillai Agencies versus State of Tamil Nadu. This case delved into the complexities surrounding the non-production of original tax invoices from a registered dealer and its implications under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (TNVAT Act). The court’s decision provides crucial insights into the interpretation of ITC provisions and the concept of double taxation within the framework of VAT legislation.
Background: The case emerged from a writ petition filed by Thillai Agencies, a registered dealer in mobile phones, challenging Section 19(15) of the TNVAT Act as unconstitutional. The dispute centered on the reversal of ITC claimed by Thillai Agencies for purchases made from M/s. Smart Trading Company, Madurai, in September 2008, on the grounds that the seller’s registration had been cancelled prior to the transaction.
Arguments and Court’s Reasoning: The petitioner argued that the provision for ITC reversal, in this case, led to a scenario of double taxation, which contravenes the objectives of the TNVAT Act and violates Articles 14 and 301 of the Indian Constitution. On the other hand, the state contended that since the selling dealer’s registration was cancelled at the time of sale, no tax was paid on the transaction, and thus, reversing the ITC does not constitute double taxation.
The court meticulously analyzed Section 19(15) alongside Section 40 of the TNVAT Act, emphasizing the statutory requirement for a registered dealer to furnish original tax invoices to avail of ITC. It highlighted that the conditions laid down for claiming ITC must be strictly adhered to, as supported by Supreme Court precedents.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
