Corporate Law : The framework permits liquidation only where the company has not defaulted on debts and can pay liabilities. It ensures a clean an...
CA, CS, CMA : The High Court ruled that retrospective cancellation of GST registration is invalid if such action is not proposed in the original...
Corporate Law : Explains how the 2025 amendment removes going-concern sales from liquidation. Highlights the shift toward speed and finality over ...
Corporate Law : IBBI Regulations 32 & 32A for liquidation: defines asset sale modes and prioritizes selling the business as a going concern to max...
Corporate Law : Understand secured creditor rights under IBC Section 52 during liquidation: relinquish security to the estate or realize independe...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : The issue addressed is ambiguity in authentication and evidentiary value of financial information in insolvency cases. The propose...
Corporate Law : The proposal aligns grievance regulations with the newly introduced definition under the amended Code. It aims to ensure uniform a...
Corporate Law : The amendments focus on better protection of creditor interests and structured insolvency processes. They introduce new mechanisms...
Corporate Law : The amendment replaces rigid statutory documentation requirements with a flexible framework. This change empowers regulators while...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that each and every commercial transaction which has resulted in loss may not be labelled as fraudulent or to hav...
Company Law : The appellate tribunal quashed orders permitting bankruptcy against personal guarantors after a creditor consented to grant additi...
Company Law : NCLT Allahabad held that financial creditor duly established existence of financial debt and default thereon on the part of the Co...
Company Law : The tribunal held that the resolution plan was invalid because several valuable properties were omitted from the Information Memor...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that Prospective Resolution Applicant or unsuccessful Resolution Applicant doesn’t have vested right to challen...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether IBBI must provide data held by a regulated entity. The Authority held that RTI applies only to information h...
Corporate Law : The appeal found that the RTI response was delayed beyond statutory timelines. The key takeaway is that delay breaches RTI provisi...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether an RVO could grant conditional enrolment to an unqualified applicant. The authority held that such enrolment...
Corporate Law : The amendment allows financial creditors to directly initiate insolvency with prior approvals, reducing delays. It ensures faster ...
Corporate Law : The study found that most MSME insolvency cases are resolved before admission, highlighting gaps in data and process efficiency. I...
NCLT Ahmedabad held that Corporate Debtor [Shree Ram Cottex Industries Pvt. Ltd.] is admitted into liquidation in terms of provisions of section 33(1)(b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in view of rejection of resolution plan u/s. 31(2) for non-compliance with statutory requirements.
NCLT Cuttack held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is admitted for initiation of Corporate Insolvency and Resolution Process against Corporate Debtor [Geosphere Industries Pvt. Ltd.] as operational debt of more than Rs. 1 crore stands established and default thereon is proved.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Synergy Food and Agro Processors Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as operational debt and default thereon is admitted.
NCLT Cuttack held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Bhilai Jaypee Cement Limited [Corporate Debtor] is liable to be admitted since operational debt and default is proved.
NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Cab-Eez Infra Tech Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as operational debt and default thereon established.
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority dismissed an RTI appeal for data on cross-border insolvency cases, noting no formal statutory framework is currently notified under the IBC.
Tribunal emphasized that the CPIO cannot be directed to create, interpret, or deduce information. Appeals seeking clarifications or explanations regarding CIRP proceedings were dismissed in line with Section 2(f) of the RTI Act.
NCLAT Delhi ruled that IBBI has no authority to issue a general circular under Section 34(4)(b) recommending appointment of insolvency professionals other than IRP/RP as liquidator, reaffirming limits on IBBI’s regulatory powers.
Tribunal admits CIRP against Bafna Motors Pvt. Ltd., ruling that post-10A period defaults exceeding the statutory threshold merit insolvency proceedings, with final claim verification to be done by IRP.
NCLT Chandigarh held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Falcon Auto Engineering Pvt. Ltd. [Corporate Debtor] admitted as operational debt and default established.
