Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Company Law

Replacement of liquidator accepted as approved by majority Stakeholders Consultation Committee

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 10256
Case Name
Padmakumar K. C. Vs Piramal Capital And Housing Finance Limited (NCLT Kochi)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Courts
Kochi NCLT, NCLT
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Padmakumar K. C. Vs Piramal Capital And Housing Finance Limited (NCLT Kochi)

NCLT Kochi held that application under Regulation 31A(11) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 valid as Stakeholders’ Consultation Committee [SCC] with majority vote has resolved to replace the present liquidator.

Facts- The present application has been filed by the Liquidator of M/s. Asten Realtors Private Limited under Regulation 31(A)(11) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process), 2016 to replace the present Liquidator, Sri. K.C. Padmakumar and appoint Sri. Sreenivasan P R as the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor as resolved by the SCC. The application also filed to fix a fee of Rs. 2 Lakh per month as the fee of the liquidator to be replaced for the period he has worked, which is equivalent to the minimum fee prescribed by the IBBI for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Conclusion- Held that considering the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, this Adjudicating Authority finds merit in the application. The Stakeholders’ Consultation Committee (SCC), with a majority vote of 94.30%, has resolved to replace the present Liquidator, Sri. K.C. Padmakumar, with Sri. Sreenivasan P.R to carry out functions as mentioned under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. Regulation 31A (11) IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 such a recommendation holds validity. Further, as per Regulation 34B of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, the minimum prescribed fee for an insolvency professional handling claims between Rs. 50 Crores and Rs. 500 Crores is Rs. 2 Lakhs per month, which is reasonable in the present case.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.