CA, CS, CMA : Explore the major notifications, circulars, and judicial developments issued during 22–28 June 2026, covering Income Tax, GST, R...
CA, CS, CMA : This weekly roundup covers key notifications, circulars, and judicial rulings issued by GST, Customs, RBI, SEBI, MCA, IBBI, and ot...
CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive review of significant developments across Income Tax, GST, Customs, DGFT, SEBI, MCA, IBBI, and RBI. The update hig...
CA, CS, CMA : The weekly roundup covers important Supreme Court rulings, GST advisories, RBI amendments, SEBI consultation papers, and insolvenc...
CA, CS, CMA : The article summarizes important notifications, circulars, judicial rulings, and regulatory changes issued between 11–17 May 202...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The NCLT held that a DRT Recovery Certificate provides a fresh cause of action, making the Section 7 application filed within thre...
Corporate Law : The NCLT admitted a Section 7 insolvency application after finding that the Corporate Debtor had acknowledged its liability under ...
Corporate Law : Finvin Investor Private Limited Vs Orix Leasing and Financial Services Limited (NCLAT Delhi) The National Company Law Appellate Tr...
Corporate Law : The Court noted that the complaint against the Resolution Professional and the related proceedings stemmed from CIRP proceedings b...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Kolkata admitted a Section 7 IBC petition after holding that the bank successfully established existence of financial deb...
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority held that the RTI application remained undisposed beyond the statutory period and directed the CPIO ...
A claim submitted without documents was later verified after the deadline but not processed as per law. The authority held that failure to place it before CoC and seek condonation violated CIRP regulations.
The IBBI flagged improper admission of a joint developer as a financial creditor without adequate verification. The ruling highlights the need to correctly classify claims under insolvency law.
The case addresses failure to place a mandatory replacement agenda despite requisite voting share. The ruling emphasizes that statutory obligations under CIRP regulations are non-discretionary and must be strictly followed.
Resolved firms demonstrated improved operations and investment activity. The findings confirm successful business revival.
The case involved failure to attend hearings and file an affidavit as directed. The Committee imposed a penalty and warning, emphasizing strict compliance with tribunal orders.
The High Court ruled that retrospective cancellation of GST registration is invalid if such action is not proposed in the original show cause notice. The judgment emphasizes adherence to natural justice and proper reasoning in administrative orders.
The appellate authority held that public authorities under the RTI Act must only provide information already available in records. They are not obligated to create or compile new data or explanations.
The appellate authority held that RTI applies only to existing records. Authorities cannot be compelled to generate Action Taken Reports, analyses, or explanations not maintained in official records.
The appellate authority clarified that under the RTI framework, public authorities are only required to provide information already available on record and cannot be compelled to create or interpret data for applicants.
The appellate authority allowed disclosure of internal file notings but refused to release documents submitted by valuers, holding them exempt under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act due to commercial confidentiality.
