CA, CS, CMA : Explore the major notifications, circulars, and judicial developments issued during 22–28 June 2026, covering Income Tax, GST, R...
CA, CS, CMA : This weekly roundup covers key notifications, circulars, and judicial rulings issued by GST, Customs, RBI, SEBI, MCA, IBBI, and ot...
CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive review of significant developments across Income Tax, GST, Customs, DGFT, SEBI, MCA, IBBI, and RBI. The update hig...
CA, CS, CMA : The weekly roundup covers important Supreme Court rulings, GST advisories, RBI amendments, SEBI consultation papers, and insolvenc...
CA, CS, CMA : The article summarizes important notifications, circulars, judicial rulings, and regulatory changes issued between 11–17 May 202...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The NCLT held that a DRT Recovery Certificate provides a fresh cause of action, making the Section 7 application filed within thre...
Corporate Law : The NCLT admitted a Section 7 insolvency application after finding that the Corporate Debtor had acknowledged its liability under ...
Corporate Law : Finvin Investor Private Limited Vs Orix Leasing and Financial Services Limited (NCLAT Delhi) The National Company Law Appellate Tr...
Corporate Law : The Court noted that the complaint against the Resolution Professional and the related proceedings stemmed from CIRP proceedings b...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Kolkata admitted a Section 7 IBC petition after holding that the bank successfully established existence of financial deb...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority held that the RTI application remained undisposed beyond the statutory period and directed the CPIO ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
The study found that most MSME insolvency cases are resolved before admission, highlighting gaps in data and process efficiency. It recommends reforms to improve transparency, recovery, and early settlements.
The authority held that accepting a plan from a non-listed applicant violated Regulation 39. The breach led to disciplinary action and suspension for three years
IBBI introduces IVS as the mandatory framework for all valuations under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The key takeaway is improved transparency and consistency in asset valuation across insolvency proceedings.
The appellate authority held that RTI applications cannot seek interpretations or clarifications on legal issues like treatment of flats in CIRP. Only existing records held by authorities can be disclosed under the RTI Act.
The issue concerns delayed response to an RTI application beyond the prescribed period. It was held that authorities must adhere to timelines and ensure timely disposal of information requests.
The IBBI held that forming a Committee of Creditors without verifying claims violates core insolvency principles. The ruling emphasizes that claim verification is mandatory before granting voting rights or conducting CoC meetings.
The Disciplinary Committee held that reconstituting the CoC without prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority violates established legal principles. Subsequent approval does not cure the initial procedural breach. The decision underscores limits on the powers of resolution professionals.
A key land asset was excluded from the CIRP, leading to rejection of the resolution plan. The regulator held that failure to include and regularize ownership violated duties and warranted suspension.
The case highlights failure to provide complete and verifiable information in the Information Memorandum. It also underscores that reliance on external systems like VDR does not replace statutory disclosure obligations.
A claim submitted without documents was later verified after the deadline but not processed as per law. The authority held that failure to place it before CoC and seek condonation violated CIRP regulations.
